Amarjit Kaur v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at…
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc.-M-No. 19121 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.05.2016
Amarjit Kaur
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Ms. Gagan Deep Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S.Aulakh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the complainant.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner states that this petition may be
dismissed as infructuous as the petitioner had gone abroad and had returned and the prayer was for going abroad.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY)
JUDGE
May 23, 2016 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2016.05.25 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Amarjit Kaur
State of Punjab
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court