details of the cases were given in the application. The learned District & Sessions Judge, Pathankot vide order dated 11.9.2015 accepted the transfer application keeping in view “no objection” of the counsel for the respondent. Presumption of truth attaches to the orders passed in the judicial proceedings. There is nothing on the record to show that learned counsel for the respondent has not given this statement before the Sessions Judge having no objection. Secondly, these cases are withdrawn, which are pending before the different Courts and have been entrusted to one Court and it will be expedient to decide all these cases by one Court to avoid conflicting judgments and orders. In the order dated 11.9.2015, the learned District & Sessions Judge, Pathankot no where has passed the order consolidating these cases. The cases are to be consolidated as per law only by the trial Court. Vide the impugned order dated 11.9.2015, the learned District & Sessions Judge on the basis of no objection given by the other party i.e. by learned counsel for the respondent and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case transferred these cases to one Court. No illegality has been committed by the learned District & Sessions Judge while passing the impugned order. No ground is made out for quashing this order. In no way, it can be held that the passing of the impugned order, in any way, amounts to miscarriage of justice.
