Partly allowed

Nargis Rani & Other v. Harminder Singh

Punjab & Haryana HC7 Sept 2016CRM-M/18991/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, relying on judicial satisfaction of a voluntary settlement and precedents Gian Singh and Kulwinder Singh, allowed a petition and quashed proceedings instituted under various IPC sections including 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC.

What did the court decide?

Complaint No. RT26 dated 17.10.2014 and summoning order dated 7.3.2015 are quashed; all consequences arising therefrom are quashed.

Nargis Rani & Other Vs Harminder Singh — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Criminal Misc. No. M-18991 of 2016 Date of decision : September 07, 2016

¶3

Nargis Rani and others

....Petitioners

versus

Harminder Singh

....Respondent

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh

¶9

Present : Mr. Rajesh Punj, Advocate, for the petitioners Ms. Namita Kandhari, Advocate, for the respondent

¶10

Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)

¶11

Report dated 6.6.2016 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Moga has been received after recording statements of accused Nargis Rani, Bindia, Raj Mohan Sachar and Vipan Sood as well as complainant Harminder Singh and the learned court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntariness, free will and without any coercion or undue pressure. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the fact that compromise will go a long way in resolving the personal dispute and to bring about personal harmony and more-so the offences for which the accused have been booked are not of very serious nature and in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR

¶12

Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.09.14 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

¶13

Criminal Misc. No. M-18991 of 2016 -2-

¶14

(Criminal) 1052 and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of Criminal Complaint No. RT26 dated 17.10.2014 (Annexure P/1) under sections 420,465,467,468,471, 120-B IPC and summoning order dated 7.3.2015 (Annexure P/2) and all consequences arising thereof are quashed, qua the present petitioners.

¶15

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

¶16

September	07, 2016	( Fateh
'tiwana'
	Whether speaking/reasoned ?	Yes/No
	Whether Reportable ?	Yes/No

¶17

Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.09.14 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Nargis Rani & Other v. Harminder Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nargis Rani & Other v. Harminder Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meena Kumari Vs Manoj Kumar and Anrs

Harinderjit Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Kulwant Singh Vs State of Punjab

Manjit Singh @ Bhutto Vs State of Punjab

Manoj Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Gurpal Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.