This court did not render a substantive judgment or provide any legal proposition. The application was dismissed solely because it was withdrawn by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CRM-A-187-MA-2014 Date of Decision: 22.11.2016
Madhu Sharma
......Applicant
Versus
Vijay Sharma
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)
Counsel for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to
withdraw the application.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
November 22, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No
Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.11.23 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Madhu Sharma
Vijay Sharma
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
