This single-judge order dismisses the criminal miscellaneous application by referring to a separate detailed order passed on the same day in a related case with the same parties. The judgment provides no substantive reasoning.
None. Order dismissed by reference to a separate detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.A-1869-MA of 2015
.....
Date of decision:8.11.2016
Tilak Raj
.....Applicant
v.
Vir Atam
.....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
.....
Present: Mr. B.S. Baath, Advocate for the applicant.
Inderjit Singh, J.
The criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed. For
reasons, see separate detailed order passed today in Criminal Misc. No.A1854-MA of 2015, Tilak Raj v. Vir Atam.
November 8, 2016. (Inderjit Singh) Judge hsp NOTE: Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.11.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Tilak Raj
Vir Atam
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
