From the record, first of all I find that no date, month and year has been mentioned as to when the loan was taken. No particulars have been mentioned that at which place, in whose presence and through which mode the amount was given. Even it has not been mentioned in the complaints as to how much amount has been given to the accused. It is stated that 4.5 lakhs along with other amount has been given. It looks improbable that the complainant is not knowing the amount which she had given to the accused as friendly loan. If she could say 4.5 lakhs, then what it means that along with other amount. There is no mention whether any other amount was given earlier or along with 4.5 lakhs. The complainant relied upon the writing stated to be given by the accused that he will return the same at the earliest but no such writing has been produced by the complainant. There is no document on the record to show the loan transaction. No document was got executed and proved on the record, at the time of borrowing of the loan by the accused. The complainant has not taken any security document from the accused at the time of advancing such a huge amount. There are no particulars as to when the loan was demanded back. Further, the complainant stated that she had received reply to the legal notice. She had mentioned that fact of having given friendly loan of 6,70,000/- in her legal notice sent to accused. She also stated that she was not having any business dealing with the accused. She further stated that accused himself or her own daughter had filled up the cheques in question. She further stated that she had given 6,70,000/- in cash to the accused. If this is so, then why this fact has not mentioned in the complaint. Why she had mentioned 4.5 lakhs Vineet Gulati 2016.12.12 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this documentalong with other amount. Chandigarh
