Allowed

Rajesh Goyal v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Dec 2016CRM-M/18097/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petition sought quashing of an FIR and consequent proceedings under IPC Sections 406 and 498-A based on a genuine voluntary compromise. The trial court confirmed the compromise's validity. The High Court allowed the petition, quashing the FIR and proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The Foreigner Registration Information (FIR) and all consequent proceedings registered thereunder are quashed qua the petitioner.

Rajesh Goyal Vs State of Punjab and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

Crl. Misc. No. M-18097 of 2016 -1-

¶2

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶3

Crl. Misc. No. M-18097 of 2016 Date of Decision: 20.12.2016

Rajesh Goyal

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

¶9

Present: Mr. S.S.Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. J.S.Bhullar, AAG, Punjab.

¶11

Mr. Mohit Setia, Advocate for Mr. Bhupinder Banga, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

¶12

¶13

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)

¶14

The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No. 130 dated 28.7.2007 registered under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, Police Station Raikot District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and all the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶15

Report has been received from the trial Court after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. The trial Court has reported that the compromise is genuine and voluntary. The trial Court has also sent the statements of the parties.

¶16

Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioner is the only accused and respondent No. 2 is the only aggrieved

¶17

person in this FIR.

¶18

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.22 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶19

-2-

¶20

Crl. Misc. No. M-18097 of 2016

¶21

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

¶22

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 , approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioner.

¶23

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

¶24

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE

¶25

December 20, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No

¶26

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.22 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Rajesh Goyal v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Goyal v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurjant Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sukhjit Singh Randhawa Vs State of Punjab

Kulwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

Gulshana & Anr. Vs Jai Singh & Ors.

Gurpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab

Vikas Vs State of Haryana