Amit Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 14 dated 23.1.2015, registered under Sections 328, 363, 365, 376, 34 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, Batala, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 20.5.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶14

State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶15

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 20.5.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE

¶17

August 24, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.24 16:08 I attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this document Whether reportable : No High Court Chandigarh

Amit Kumar v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amarjit Mann Vs State of Haryana and Another

Anil Kumar Hand @ Babba Handa and Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Sharma Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Vishal Yadav Vs State of Haryana

Surjit Kumar @ Jitu Vs State of Punjab

Lakh Raj Vs State of Haryana