Sohan Singh & Sonu v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought regular bail. The state counsel noted hostilities from prosecution witnesses but highlighted medical and FSL reports indicating the petitioner's guilt. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal, leading the court to dismiss the petition on the same ground.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-17101 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.10.2016
Sohan Singh @ Sonu
......Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Mahima Yashpal, A.A.G, Haryana
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on instruction from the Invetigation Officer submitted that though the complainant and the prosecutrix have turned hostile, but the Investigating Agency has medical report of the prosecutrix, statement of the prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C and report of the FSL which shows that the offence has been committed by the petitioner. Out of 16 witness, 09 have been examined.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sohan Singh @ Sonu
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
RITU BAHRI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/17101/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court