Kanwar Sandhu Vs State of Punjab

In view of the said circumstance, this court is of the considered opinion that being a visitor u/s 468(3) of the Punjab Jail Manual, the petitioner appears to have been permitted an interview with Balwant Singh Rajowana. So far as the allegation that the entry was arranged without any recording in the visitor's register, the petitioner prima facie is not liable for any violation. It does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation, especially when the jail officials have been granted the concession of prearrest bail by this court.

¶15

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that he will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. This order will remain operative till the presentation of challan. In case the prosecution agency, on the basis of investigation, forms an opinion to present challan against the petitioner,

¶16

Cr. Misc. M 16341 of 2016

¶17

2

¶18

the petitioner on appearance before the court concerned, will be entitled to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the said court.

¶19

July 28 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/ No Whether reportable Yes/ No

Kanwar Sandhu v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanwar Sandhu v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwani Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Puran Singh Vs State of Punjab

Krishan @ Padda Vs State of Haryana

Vijay Vs State of Haryana

Amardeep Singh @ Sonu @ Saleda Vs State of Punjab

Parminder Singh @ Lucky Vs State of Punjab