Allowed

Kuldeep Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Mar 2016CRM-M/15394/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed a writ petition for quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a verified written compromise between parties and a favorable report from the Junior Magistrate, holding that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the proceedings pending.

What did the court decide?

The FIR No.09 and all consequent proceedings conducted on its basis are quashed qua the petitioners.

Kuldeep Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr. — Domestic Violence | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

��

��

�� ^�� �� !

"#$%&&'��()*��&+,�

¶5

.&+,#,

¶6

��/�&��0�-#)1/2��/)��&+�

� ��&,'�)%&)��,�

��34��56��6��7

��

Present : Mr. Tarun Singhal, Advocate for

¶11

Mr. N. K. Vadehra, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

Mr. K. S. Aulakh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.

¶13

None for the respondent No.2$complainant.

¶14

��

¶15

��

¶16

The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.09 dated 06.10.2011 registered under Sections 498$A and 406 read with Section 34 IPC at Police Station Women, District Ludhiana and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise (Annexure P$1) arrived at between the parties.

¶17

Report has been received from learned JMIC, Ludhiana after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. Learned JMIC has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. Learned JMIC has also sent statements of the parties.

¶18

RAJ KUMAR 2016.03.15 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

��

¶20

��

¶21

Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR.

¶22

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR

¶23

pending.

¶24

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in �� !��"�#� , approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in $��"��"��  , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioners.

¶25

Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

¶26

��^�� ��/+8� ��  �� ��

¶27

RAJ KUMAR 2016.03.15 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Kuldeep Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Vs State of Haryana

Neeraj Kumar Vs State of Haryana

Lalit Chauhan Vs State of Punjab

Pavitar Singh Vs State of Punjab

Rashmi Sharma Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Krishna Kumari Vs State of Punjab and Others