The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a petition after repeated defaults, as the petitioner had failed to appear on the last date of hearing. The court held the petitioner was no longer interested in the matter.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
�����������������������������
Date of decision: 28th January, 2016
Tejinder Singh @ Sonu
� Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
� Respondents
����� �����!�"��������#����������������#�����
Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab.
�����������#����$��������"�
In spite of repeated pass3overs, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner, which was the situation even on the last date of hearing. This being the second consecutive default, reflects that the petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the
present petition.
Dismissed for non3prosecution.
�������������#������
������
�%&'%()��*$����+��
���
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.01 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
Tejinder Singh @ Sonu
State of Punjab
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
