Recieved oral petition under Section 482CrPC seeking protection from respondents No 4 and 5; directed SSP to inquire into petitioners' grievances.
Direction to SSP to inquire into petitioners' grievances and take appropriate action if substance found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-13307 of 2016
--1--
112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13307 of 2016 DECIDED ON: APRIL 23, 2016
NARINDER KAUR & ANOTHER
.....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Harjeet Savra, Advocate for the petitioners.
JASPAL SINGH, J (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5.
look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in their representation dated SHAM SUNDER 2016.04.23 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-13307 of 2016
--2--
April 18, 2016 (Annexure P-5) and if some substance is found, to take appropriate action in accordance with law.
APRIL 23, 2016 sham
(JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE
SHAM SUNDER 2016.04.23 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Narinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
