Petitioners, facing a situation where police had not received a threat complaint, sought to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh complaint. The court granted the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GAURAV ARORA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 2016.12.02 16:19I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document AT CHANDIGARH Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M-12977 of 2016 Date of decision : 17.11.2016
Kulwinder Kaur and anr.
......Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. D.R. Singla, DAG, Haryana
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned State counsel on instruction from HC Avtar Singh has informed the Court that out of 12 witnesses, 04 have been examined and the next date is 30.11.2016 and on this date, 04 witnesses are to be examined. Further it has been stated that no complaint has been received by the police with respect to threat given to the petitioner.
Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition, with a liberty to file a fresh complaint, in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
17.11.2016 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Kulwinder Kaur and anr.
State of Punjab and ors.
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
