The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition by relying on a separate detailed order passed the same day concerning a similar matter.
Petition allowed by order of reference to a separate detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.M-12534 of 2012 (O&M)
.....
Date of decision:27.9.2016
Pushpinder Kaur and others
.....Petitioners
v.
State of Punjab and another
.....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
.....
Present: Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mahir Sood, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Shivali, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.
Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Inderjit Singh, J.
The criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. For reasons, see separate detailed order passed today in Criminal Misc. No.M-3993 of 2010, Surjit Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another.
September 27, 2016. (Inderjit Singh) Judge hsp NOTE: Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.10.17 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Pushpinder Kaur and others
State of Punjab
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
