Allowed

Gurdeep v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Apr 2016CRM-M/11422/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed a bail petition filed under Section 304/B and 34 IPC. The petitioner, in custody for nearly a year due to trial delay and a Section 319 Cr.P.C. application, was released on regular bail bond upon execution of personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

What did the court decide?

Released on regular bail on execution of adequate personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

Gurdeep Vs State of Haryana — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

��

��

�� ^�� ��

!"#$$%��

($")!)

���$��+�,"-'�

� ��$)%�'#$'�

��,��./��01��,�1�,�2

¶9

��

¶10

Present : Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Ms. Dimple Jain, AAG, Haryana.

¶12

��

¶13

��

¶14

The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No.136 dated 05.03.2015, registered under Sections 304/B read with Section 34 IPC, Police Station Samalkha, District Panipat.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody since March, 2015 and the trial has got delayed as an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was moved. The counsel further contends that father had been granted bail. Counsel also refers to the complaint, on the basis of which, the FIR was registered and urges that it does not refer to any incident or call made by the daughter a day prior to the incident and the complainant had made improvement in the court and it was suicide.

¶17

RAJ KUMAR 2016.04.08 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

��

¶19

��

¶20

The petitioner is in custody for almost a year. Statement

¶21

of the complainant has been recorded. The trial will take long.

¶22

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail on execution of adequate personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Panipat.

¶23

^�, ��  ��

¶24

�� ��

¶25

RAJ KUMAR 2016.04.08 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Gurdeep v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurdeep v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Sharma Vs State of Haryana

Ravinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Jasvir Kaur and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Satnam Singh Vs State of Punjab

Resham Singh Vs Rajinder Kaur

Jamil Ahemed & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.