This judgment converts an interim order dated 4.4.2016 into an absolute order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, noting that she has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation.
The interim interim order dated 4.4.2016 is made absolute granting bail subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TAPINDER SINGH MANN IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB 2016.07.11 16:38 AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 11396 of 2016 Date of decision: 11.7.2016
Sunita
Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana
Respondent
Present: Mr. SS Nara, Advocate. Mr. CS Bakshi, Addl.A.G. Hry
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
On the instructions of SI Resham Singh, it has been informed that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation. The allegations levelled by the complainant are being investigated.
The petition is allowed. Interim order dated 4.4.2016 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.
July 11 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail should be allowed after the petitioner joined the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunita
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
