Kashmir Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Through the instant petition, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 113 dated 25.12.2015, registered under Sections 406, 498-A, 313, 506 IPC, Police Station Valtoha, Tarn Taran.

¶14

Notice sent to respondent No. 2 has been received back served but there is no appearance on her behalf.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioners states that pursuant to the order dated 01.4.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation.

¶16

State counsel on instructions from ASI Nirmal Singh states that all the articles have been returned and the petitioners have joined the investigation.

¶17

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 4.1.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioners is made absolute subject to the conditions laid Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.11 10:43 down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶18

Crl. Misc. No. M-11159 of 2016

¶19

-2-

¶20

Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(ANITA CHAUDHRY)
JUDGE
August 10, 2016
Gurpreet
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶22

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.11 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Kashmir Kaur and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kashmir Kaur and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukram Pal Vs State of Haryana

Mikel @ Kamma Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Nawab Singh Virk Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Bobby Vs State of Haryana

Ajay Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Satbir Vs State of Haryana