This order dismisses a criminal miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and non-deposit of litigation expenses.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc.-M-11077 of 2015 Date of Decision: 28.05.2016
Rohit
.....Petitioner
Versus
Dolly @ Geet and others ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: None.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)
Even on the second call, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner even on the last three dates.
Petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 20,000/- with the Registrar of this Court within one month as litigation expenses but the petitioner has not deposited the said amount.
The respondent would have a right to recover the litigation
expenses.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
May 28, 2016 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2016.05.30 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Rohit
Dolly @ Geet and others
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
