Amit Surya Vs State of Haryana

Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 43 dated 27.11.2015, registered under Sections 498-A IPC, Women Police Station, Jhajjar.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 30.3.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶16

State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶17

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 30.3.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of

¶18

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.09 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶19

Crl. Misc. No. M-10771 of 2016

¶20

-2-

¶21

the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

The petitioner will deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- with the trial Court upto 30.1.2017 and the trial Court will release the said amount to the complainant.

¶23

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 09, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes

¶24

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.09 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Amit Surya v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Surya v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narender Vs State of Haryana

Ankush Kumar @ Sukhi Vs State of Punjab

Bimla Vs State of Haryana

Gurmit Singh & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Manju Vs Manoj Soni and Ors.

Amarjeet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.