Gurbhej Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 37 dated 31.12.2015, registered under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC, Police Station Women Cell, Ferozepur.

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 22.3.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶18

State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶19

The gold kara and household articles and car have been recovered. There is dispute with regard to the gold articles. The complainant will have to prove their case at the trial.

¶20

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the

¶21

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.07 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶22

-2-

¶23

Crl. Misc. No. M-10358 of 2016

¶24

merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 22.3.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶25

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 06, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No

¶26

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.07 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Gurbhej Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurbhej Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avtar Lal Vs Tej Pal and Ors.

Shakti Vs State of Haryana

Mahesh Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Daljit Singh Vs State of Punjab

Mandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab

Vishal Sharma Vs State of Punjab