youths entering the shop after alighting from a car and had caught hold of him and Nasib Chand from their neck, followed by Nasib Chand being fired at, yet he could not state as to whether the accused, who were present in the dock, were the same persons who had come to the shop and fired at Nasib Chand. He also deposed that when Nasib Chand was fired at, he had become unconscious and only when he was attended to by one Gora, who had a shop nearby by giving him water that he had regained consciousness. He also deposed that he had not seen the registration number plate of the car. However, as he did not support the prosecution case, learned Additional Public Prosecutor got him declared hostile and cross-examined him but he refused to toe the line of the prosecution. In his cross-examination by the defence, he testified that the accused persons in the dock were not the same persons who had launched the attack on 9.5.2009 and murdered Nasib Chand. He also admitted that no test identification parade was held after joining him. Similarly, PW2 Sukhwinder Kumar, who ran a tailoring shop at Adda Kot Fatuhi testified that on 9.5.2009 at about 4.30 p.m., when he was cutting clothes on the counter, he heard an alarm but paid no attention to the same as the boys in the adjacent shops used to raise such noises while watching match on the TV. When there was a noise, once again, he came out of the shop and found Nasib Chand lying in an injured condition. On seeing Nasib Chand in an injured condition, the wife of this witness became unconscious and, therefore, instead of going towards the place where Nasib Chand was lying, he started looking after his wife. He had become perplexed and could not decide as to what to do. He also deposed that he did not know the registration number and make of the car. He also did not see the assailants at the spot as they were in
