Allowed

Ram Karan Dass and Ors. v. Sri Sanatan Dharm Mahabir Dal and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Aug 2016CR/4905/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this revision petition challenging an order in an ejectment suit, the High Court granted an effective opportunity to the petitioners-respondents to conclude evidence upon payment of Rs. 5,000 as costs. The impugned order closing evidence was set aside, and the revision was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; petitioners allowed to conclude evidence; Rs. 5,000 costs payable as condition precedent.

Ram Karan Dass and Ors. Vs Sri Sanatan Dharm… — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

C.R. No.4905 of 2016

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

C.R. No.4905 of 2016 Date of Decision.03.08.2016

¶5

Ram Karan Dass and others

¶6

.......Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Sri Sanatan Dharm Mahabir Dal and others ........Respondents

¶9

Present: Mr. Harmanpreet Kaur (Simmi), Advocate for the petitioners.

¶10

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶11

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

¶12

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

¶13

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

¶15

AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL)

¶16

The petitioners-respondents in the ejectment petition before the Rent Controller are aggrieved of the order dated 13.07.2016 whereby their evidence has been closed.

¶17

Ms. Harmanpreet Kaur (Simmi), learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners-respondents are willing to produce all the witnesses at the adjourned date, even summoned witnesses, if necessary, in case one opportunity is granted.

¶18

I have heard the counsel for the petitioners-respondents and appraised the paper book and of the view that no doubt, the petitionersrespondents were negligent in concluding the evidence. However, in order to advance justice and prevent miscarriage of justice, I deem it appropriate to grant one effective opportunity to the petitioners to conclude their evidence.

¶19

Keeping in view the aforementioned observations, the

¶20

PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.04 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶21

C.R. No.4905 of 2016 -2-

¶22

impugned order is set aside and the petitioners-respondents shall conclude their evidence in accordance with law subject to payment of costs of `5,000/- which shall be condition precedent. If the costs is not paid as directed, the order passed already by the court below shall stand restored.

¶23

The impugned order is set aside and the revision petition is

¶24

allowed.

¶25

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 03, 2016 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶26

PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.08.04 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ram Karan Dass and Ors. v. Sri Sanatan Dharm Mahabir Dal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Karan Dass and Ors. v. Sri Sanatan Dharm Mahabir Dal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aas Mohammad & Anr. Vs Sarfraj & Ors.

Sachin Jain Vs Chief Executive Officer and Another

Mukesh Sharma Vs State of Punjab

Canara Bank Vs Suresh Gulia & Ors.

M/S Swastik Trader Vs Food Corporation of India and Ors.

Swaran Kaur and Ors. Vs Swinder Kaur and Ors.