In a revision petition under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC, the High Court allowed the plaintiff-tenant to amend the plaint in a civil suit seeking injunction and demolition to convert parts of relief. The revision petition was dismissed.
Revision petition dismissed; amendment permitted; defendant liberty to file amended written statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R. No.3803 of 2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.3803 of 2016
Date of Decision.30.05.2016
Shashi Kiran Mahajan
.....Petitioner
Vs.
Arun Kumar and another ........Respondents
Present: Mr. Parveen K. Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)
with law.
PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.06.01 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
C.R. No.3803 of 2016 -2-
petition is dismissed.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
May 30, 2016 Pankaj*
PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.06.01 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an amendment to a plaint in a civil suit is maintainable.
Whether the amendment causes prejudice or falls within limitation.
Whether the landlord is entitled to file an additional written statement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shashi Kiran Mahajan
Arun Kumar
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
