Baldev Singh v. Kapoor Singh etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.3266 of 1991 Date of decision:24.09.2016
Baldev Singh
... Petitioner
Vs.
Kapur Singh and others
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Sunny Saggar, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner passed on copies of the orders rendered in RSA Nos.2656 of 1988 and 2653 of 1988 which are taken on record. He submits that application under Section 10 of Code of Civil Procedure was filed during the pendency of the aforementioned Regular Second Appeals. He further submits that during the interregnum, the parties have compromised the matter.
In view of the aforementioned statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present revision is disposed of as infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 24, 2016 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2016.09.26 13:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Baldev Singh
Kapur Singh and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court