Samai Singh v. Bhool Chand and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2015 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
of 2015 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R. No.2334 of 2015 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.2334 of 2015 (O&M)
Date of Decision.01.06.2016
Samai Singh
.....Petitioner
Vs.
Bhool Chand and others ........Respondents
Present: Mr. Shashi Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)
C.M. No.11753-CII of 2016
For the reasons stated in the application, order passed by this Court on 26.05.2016 is recalled and the appeal is restored to its original number.
Application is allowed.
C.R. No.2334 of 2015
PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.06.03 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
C.R. No.2334 of 2015 (O&M) -2-
sure bearing on the rights of parties in relation to the property, the plaintiff has withdrawn the suit and the Court has also granted permission to file a fresh suit, I will find no prejudice by the permission being granted to the plaintiff, for, after all, a statement of fact which is so essential if it was not stated, there ought to be an opportunity to bring that fact to light and the fresh suit instituted. There is no issue of limitation concerning a right which is asserted by the new suit which is instituted and therefore, I will make no intervention with the order already passed.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
June 01, 2016 Pankaj*
PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.06.03 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.06.03Referred¶23
Samai Singh
Bhool Chand and others
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court