under Section 33 to 35 of Stamp Act filed by defendant No.1 dated 02.08.2014 and filed by defendant No.2 dated 29.7.2014 dismissed. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is at liberty to record his objector in record to the document which will be considered at this stage of final argument.” The factors noticed above, in my view, lead to irresistible conclusion, the petitioner has been making all possible attempts, hindrance/impediments to thwart the adjudication of the suit, much less, to bring it to its logical end. The order dated 29.08.2014 is clear and unambiguous. It does not lead to any confusion in the mind of the Court or as well as party that objection raised vis-a-vis the admissibility and the impounding of the document shall not be considered by the Court. In my view, the impugned order deciding the application, seeking invocation of the provisions under Sections 33 to 35 of 1899 Act, is an act of the skepticism which does not have any answer to it. In case the Court does not decide the objection vis-a-vis the admissibility and the applicability of the provisions of the 1899 Act, the party would be at liberty to seek the vindication of the order in accordance with law, but not in the manner and mode which has been adopted. I am of the opinion that it is a clear cut case of adoption of a dilatory and delaying tactics at the instance of the petitioner/lessee which should not go unnoticed by this Court.
