The petitioners were present but the scheme of amalgamation was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner counsel was unable to contact the petitioners despite multiple attempts.
The petition under Scheme of Amalgamation was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CP No.21 of 2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.1.2016
In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation between:
Jewel Garments Private Limited
..... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.1 and ..... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 with ..... Petitioner/Transferee Company
Richa Building Systems Private Limited
Richa Holdings Limited
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. J.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Manjit Singh, Deputy Official Liquidator.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he had tried to contact the petitioners number of times, however, they are not responding. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
22.1.2016
sharmila
SHARMILA 2016.01.25 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. Chandigarh
Jewel Garments Private Limited and Richa Building Systems Private Limited
Richa Holdings Limited
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
