The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition as not maintainable for lack of cited law regarding the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
petition dismissed as not maintainable
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VINOD KUMAR 2016.07.25 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1705 of 2016 Date of decision:23.07.2016
Nishan Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Gagandeep Singh Virk and others ...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. C.L.Premy, Advocate, for the petitioner. *****
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
This petition is filed for the alleged non-compliance of the order passed by the Joint Development Commissioner, IRDP, Punjab, dated 18.11.2015, exercising the powers of Commissioner under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961.
Counsel for the petitioner has failed to cite law as to how the present petition is maintainable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the order passed by the Commissioner.
Consequently, the present petition is hereby dismissed being not maintainable.
July 23, 2016 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition is maintainable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Nishan Singh
Gagandeep Singh Virk
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
