The court disposed of a COCP petition pending before it, noting a stayed status quo from a related civil appeal. No substantive relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1303 of 2015 (O&M)
Date of decision: 25.4.2016
Ranjit Singh
..... Petitioner
Versus
Arshdeep Singh Thind
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Balbir Singh Sewak, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anant Kataria, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
Learned counsel for the State has produced copy of the order dated 4.4.2016 passed in LPA No.859 of 2015, in which while issuing notice of motion, status quo regarding possession has been directed and payment of cost has been stayed.
In view of the aforesaid fact, at this stage, the present petition is disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioner to get the same revived in case after decision of the aforesaid LPA, relief admissible to the petitioner is not granted.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
25.4.2016
sharmila
SHARMILA 2016.04.27 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ranjit Singh
Arshdeep Singh Thind
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
