Appellant sought to withdraw VAT Appeal No. 143 of 2014. The Acting Chief Justice allowed the withdrawal of the appeal.
Allowance of withdrawal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VATAP No. 143 of 2014 Date of Decision:- 23.07.2015
M/s. Quality Marketing Group, Rohtak
......Appellant(s)
vs.
State of Haryana and others
......Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Avneesh Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana.
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw the
present appeal.
Ordered accordingly.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
23.07.2015
shivani
SHIVANI GUPTA 2015.07.24 12:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
M/s. Quality Marketing Group
State of Haryana
S.J. VAZIFDAR
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
