Ghanshyam v. Rajinder
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.4306 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.01.2015
Ghanshyam
... Appellant
Vs.
Rajinder
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:None.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Vide order dated 22.09.2014, the appeal was re-listed, with a direction to Registry to inform the counsel for the appellant for the date fixed i.e. 27.01.2015.
As per office report, vide letter dated 27.09.2014, counsel for the appellant has been informed for listing of the appeal.
Today, there is no representation on behalf of the
appellant.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE
January 27, 2015 savita
SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2015.01.28 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Ghanshyam
Rajinder
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court