and registration of sale deed, firstly on December 22, 2006 and then February 22, 2007. So, there is violation of terms & conditions of agreement on the part of plaintiff – Gurcharan Singh, whereas Parkash Kaur, predecessor-in-interest of the appellants has been ready and willing to perform his part of contract. Even on the date stipulated in the agreement, she remained present in the office of Sub Registrar for getting sale deed executed, with all the documents including No Due Certificate etc. It was plaintiff Gurcharan Singh who did not turn up to perform his part of agreement. Even, she also got recorded her presence before the office of Sub Registrar. Though, plaintiff is alleged to have issued a Notice dated April 21, 2007 Ex.P3 to defendant Parkash Kaur but even then, he was not ready and willing to perform his part. In such circumstances, affidavit dated May 9, 2007 Ex.P5 is of no held to the plaintiff. Moreover, there is an escalation of price after the execution of agreement of sale and the property which is agreed to be sold, was not less than ` 25 lac, especially in view of circumstances that it was located in none of the best localities. Since Parkash Kaur had been ready and willing to execute the sale deed as per terms & conditions of the agreements of sale on payment of valid sale consideration, it
