This second appeal regarding an ex parte decree was dismissed. The Appellate Court correctly held that no substantial question of law arose since the appellant failed to contest or set aside the ex parte decree in time.
The second appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RSA No.3742 of 2015 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.3742 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision.11.08.2015
Rewant Singh
.......Appellant
Versus
Satinder Kumar and others
......Respondents
Present: Mr. Naresh Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)
C.M. No.9183-C of 2015
For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 8 days in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Application is allowed.
RSA No.3742 of 2015
orders.
PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.08.14 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2-
RSA No.3742 of 2015 (O&M)
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
August 11, 2015 Pankaj*
PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.08.14 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rewant Singh
Satinder Kumar
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
