This court disposed of a mutual compromise. Appeal filed by appellant(s) on basis of compromise arrived with respondent(s) was dismissed as withdrawn. Applications also disposed of.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
������
�������������������
�����������������������������������������������
CM-4099 & 4245-C-2015 in/and RSA No.2000 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.08.2015
Basant Singh & Anr. . . . . Appellants
VS.
Amar Singh & Ors. . . . . Respondents
���������������������������������������
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Nishan Singh Chahal, Advocate for the appellants Mr. Munish Jolly, Advocate for the respondents *****
���������������������
Both the above-cited applications moved by appellant No.1 & 2 seek to withdraw the instant appeal on the basis of mutual understanding/compromise arrived at with the respondents.
Since the appellants have arrived at a compromise/mutual understanding with the respondents and as prayed for by them, this appeal is held to have become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The applications as well as the main appeal stand disposed of.
��������� � ���+*,%��%(-�� !"#$%&�#$'()%*� �+./0
!"#$%&�#$'()%*�
V.VISHAL 2015.09.08 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Basant Singh
Amar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
