Mangat Ram v. Chief Canal Officer & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Letters Patent Appeal withdrawn by appellant who wished to move an application before the Single Judge regarding a proposal in the Chief Canal Officer's report. Appeal disposed with appellant's request.
What did the court decide?
Appeal allowed to be withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Letters Patent Appeal No.252 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 13, 2015
Mangat Ram
.....Appellant
versus
Chief Canal Officer/BWS, Haryana Irrigatrion and WR and others .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.
Present:Mr.B.S.Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant.
-.-
- Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mangat Ram
- respondent
Chief Canal Officer/BWS, Haryana Irrigation and WR
Coram
Surya Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- LPA/252/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court