Counsel for the State submitted that a defaulting police personnel was adequately punished. The petitioner raised no objection. The court dismissed the petition as no further order was required.
No further orders to be passed in the present case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
IOIN Criminal Misc.No.M-32298 of 2014 Date of Decision: 10th July, 2015
Parhlad Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Vipul Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Piyush Bansal, DAG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Hardev Singh, submits that the defaulting police personnel has been adequately punished by the punishing authority and the said order has been placed on record, therefore, the present petition be disposed of.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the above prayer.
In view of the submission of learned counsel for the State, no further orders are required to be passed in the present case.
It is made clear that the prayer for bail to the petitioner has already been decided by this Court.
July 10, 2015 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2015.07.14 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Parhlad Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
