The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Sita Wanti for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the appellant on two occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-2929-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 11 2015
Sita Wanti
.....Appellant
Versus
Surinder Kumar and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr.Paul S.Saini, Advocate
for the respondent-Insurance Company.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral)
The case has been called twice. No one has put in
appearance for the appellant. Even on 16.01.2015, no one had
appeared for the appellant.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
May 11, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE
MEENU 2015.05.12 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Sita Wanti
Surinder Kumar and others
Nareesh Kumar Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
