This court allowed the appellant to withdraw her main appeal following a compromise between the parties evidenced by payment of a sum of INR 20 lakhs. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw main appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M. No. 4843-CII of 2015 and FAO-M-219 of 2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No. 4843-CII of 2015 and FAO-M-219 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION :- April 08, 2015
Anuradha
....Appellant
Versus
Lalit Tuteja
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
Present :- Mr. A.D.S. Sukhija, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. ***
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
C.M. No. 4843-CII of 2015
The application is filed praying for permission to withdraw the main appeal in view of the compromise dated 14.2.2015 entered into between the parties.
Both the parties along with their respective counsel are present. We heard the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side.
We find that a sum of `20 lacs in the shape of an FDR in the name of minor daughter Himakshi has been received by the
PARVINDER SINGH 2015.04.10 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
2
C.M. No. 4843-CII of 2015 and FAO-M-219 of 2014
appellant as per the averment found in the above application. In terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the remaining amount of `20 lacs in the shape of a bank draft was tendered in open Court by counsel for the respondent to counsel for the appellant and the same was accepted by the latter. As the matter has been compromised between the parties and the applicant has expressed his desire to withdraw the appeal, permission is granted. The application is allowed.
FAO-M-219 of 2014
In view of the orders passed by this Court in C.M. No. 4843-CII of 2015, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
(RAJ RAHUL GARG) JUDGE
April 08, 2015
p.singh
PARVINDER SINGH 2015.04.10 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Anuradha
Lalit Tuteja
M. Jeyapaul
Raj Rahul Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
