Single-paragraph order in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana where the court agreed their result would follow a separate judgment disposed of on the same date by a separate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 9016 of 2015 ( O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 07. 08. 2015
M/ s Lal l i Const r uct i on Company
…. . Pet i t i oner
ver sus
The St at e of Punj ab, et c.
. . . . . Respondent s
CORAM: - HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE G. S. SANDHAWALI A
Pr esent : Mr . KL Goyal , Sr . Advocat e wi t h Mr . Sandeep Goyal , Advocat e f or t he pet i t i oner
Mr . Jagmohan Bansal , Addl . A. G. , Punj ab
S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NGCHI EF JUSTI CE :
I t was agr eed t hat t he r esul t i n t hi s pet i t i on wi l l f ol l ow t he r esul t i n Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 21811 of 2014 Amr i t Banaspat i Company Lt d. vs. St at e of Punj ab and ot her s, whi ch was di sposed of by a separ at e or der and j udgment of even dat e.
For t he r easons st at ed t her ei n, t he pet i t i on i s
di smi ssed.
( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE
RAVINDER SHARMA 2015.08.13 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
M/s Lalli Construction Company
The State of Punjab
S. J. Vazifdar
G. S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
