Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners did not appear on hearing dates or the day of judgment. No substantive reasoning provided.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8705 of 1994
Date of Decision:09.02.2015
Sardar Singh and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others … Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
Present: None.
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. ( Oral )
On the last two dates of hearing i.e. 14.3.2013 and 31.7.2014, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even today, none appears on behalf of the petitioners.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE 09.02.2015 rajeev
RAJEEV THAKRAL 2015.02.09 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sardar Singh
another
State of Haryana
DEEPAK SIBAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
