Disposed

Rajender Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC15 Jan 2015CWP/679/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the non-allotment of land plots to Below Poverty Line residents under the Mahatma Gandhi Gramin Basti Yojna. The court disposed of the matter without expressing views on merits, directing respondents to verify claims and decide within four months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent nos.2 to 5 to verify petitioners' claim and take appropriate decision within four months.

Rajender Kumar and Ors. Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.679 of 2015 Date of Decision: January 15, 2015.

¶3

Rajender Kumar and others versus

¶4

State of Haryana and others

¶5

.....Petitioners

¶6

.....Respondents

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

¶8

Present : Mr.Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶9

-.-

¶10

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶12

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶13

¶14

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶15

The petitioners are residents of village Mohammadpur, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari. They claim themselves to be living Below the Poverty Line (BPL) to whom the Gram Panchayat decided to allot plots of 100 square yards. Their grievance is that though they are fully eligible for such allotment under the 'Mahatma Gandhi Gramin Basti Yojna' which the State Government has decided to implement vide Policy memo dated 1.2.2008, the respondents are still not considering their claim. It appears from the averments that an exercise to identify the eligible persons was undertaken and the petitioners were found eligible but the follow up action by the Deputy Commissioner, Rewari or Gram Panchayat of their village is still awaited.

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners have placed reliance on a Government Policy which, according to

¶17

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.02 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

[2]

¶19

CWP No.679 of 2015

¶20

them, has not been given effect, we dispose of this writ petition, however without expressing any views on the merits, with a direction to respondent nos.2 to 5 to verify the claim of the petitioners as contained in this petition and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶21

Ordered accordingly.

¶22

Dasti.

¶23

January 15, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE

¶24

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.02 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Rajender Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajender Kumar and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India & Ors. Vs Central Administrative Tribunal & Anr.

Patti Maliyan Mauja Palwal Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Chhaju Ram Vs Comissioner Hisar Division and Ors.

Union of India Vs Ch. Devilal College of Ayurveda and Ors.

Balwinder Singh & Ors. Vs Fc & Ors.

Parampal Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.