The single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's application for a PGT English post based on lack of required teaching experience, relying on a pre-decided order.
Quashing of impugned order dated 06.03.2013 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.5994 of 2013 Date of decision: 09.03.2015
Maneesha Bansal
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana for the respondents – State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned order dated 06.03.2013, whereby, the application form of the petitioner for the post of PGT English was rejected on the ground that he was not having required experience of four years in school cadre.
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has relied upon CWP No.4110 of 2013 titled as 'Chander Pal Singh and another vs. State of Haryana and others' and the same has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 18.12.2013 (Annexure R-2).
In view of the decision in CWP No.4110 of 2013, the present writ petition is dismissed.
09.03.2015 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE
NEETU RANI 2015.03.12 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application form of the petitioner for the post of PGT English should be rejected due to lack of required experience of four years in school cadre.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Chander Pal Singh and another vs. State of Haryana and othersReferred¶13
CWP No.4110 of 2013 titled as Chander Pal Singh and another vs. State of Haryana and others
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maneesha Bansal
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
