Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on the counsel's statement that the case matter no longer subsists. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.5089 of 1997
Date of Decision:07.01.2015
Mohan Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
Present: Mr. P.S. Sullar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Saini, Assistant A.G., Haryana.
DEEPAK SIBAL J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has
become infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner,
this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
January 07, 2015 (DEEPAK SIBAL) rajeev JUDGE
RAJEEV THAKRAL 2015.01.08 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Mohan Singh
State of Haryana
Deepak Sibal
Rajeev Thakral
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
