Petitioner apprehended disqualification from public auction under Car Bazar Policy instructions. Court found no reason for apprehension and disposed of the petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum in case of rejection.
Petition disposed with liberty to approach appropriate forum if application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.4818 of 2015 Date of Decision: March 18, 2015
Rajneesh Jain
.....Petitioner
versus
Union Territory of Chandigarh and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.
Present:Mr.Sushil Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
The petitioner, on the basis of his own interpretation of Clause-7 of “General Instructions to Applicants” appended with the Car Bazar Policy, apprehends that he might not be treated eligible to participate in the public auction.
As of now, we see no reason or basis for such an apprehension. In case the petitioner's application is rejected, we grant him liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
With liberty afore-mentioned, the writ petition stands disposed of.
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.03.20 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Rajneesh Jain
Union Territory of Chandigarh
Surya Kant
P.B. Bajíanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
