Disposed

Thomas Gill and Anr. v. Director Rural Development and Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC27 Feb 2015CWP/3598/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged allotment of residential plots to ineligible persons. As the case involved disputed facts of eligibility requiring departmental enquiry, the court directed the Principal Secretary to treat the petition as a representation-cum-further appeal and decide it within four months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Principal Secretary to treat the writ petition as a representation-cum further appeal and adjudicate it within four months.

Thomas Gill and Anr. Vs Director Rural Development… — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.3598 of 2015 Date of Decision: February 27, 2015

¶3

Thomas Gill and another .....Petitioners

¶4

versus

¶5

Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab and others .....Respondents

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

¶7

Present:Mr.B.Sidhu, Advocate, for

¶8

Mr.J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶9

-.-

¶10

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶12

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶13

¶14

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶15

The grievance of the petitioners in the instant case is against the allotment of 5 marla residential plots allotted by the Gram Panchayat-respondent No.2 to respondent Nos.3 to 36. The above-stated allotment has been made under the Government Policy dated 17.04.2001 (Annexure P-4).

¶16

The petitioners have in their long story made an attempt to establish that many of the allottees are ineligible; and the eligible persons like them have been over-looked by the Sarpanch for the reasons other than merit.

¶17

The petitioners earlier challenged the resolution of the Gram Panchayat for the above-mentioned allotments, before the Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab, who has vide order dated 29.01.2015 rejected the allegations made by them, observing that the Gram Panchayat has passed the resolution after following the prescribed

¶18

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.03.24 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.3598 of 2015

[2]

procedure.

Still aggrieved, the petitioners have preferred this writ petition.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and considering the fact that the writ petition raises several disputed question of facts which may be resolved by the departmental authorities only after summoning the records and/or after holding a fact-finding enquiry, coupled with the fact that the petitioners are alleging violation of the eligibility criteria prescribed in the Government Policy dated 17.04.2001, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Principal Secretary, Government of Punjab, Department of Rural Development and Panchayats, to treat this writ petition as a representation-cum further appeal on behalf of the petitioners and adjudicate the same in accordance with law and after observing the principles of natural justice, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶24

The allotments as well as delivery of possession of the plots shall be subject to final outcome of those proceedings.

¶25

Ordered accordingly.

¶26

Dasti.

¶27

February 27, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE

¶28

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.03.24 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Thomas Gill and Anr. v. Director Rural Development and Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thomas Gill and Anr. v. Director Rural Development and Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Wasan Singh Vs Director Panchayat Pb.

Sube Singhand Ors. Vs Additional Director C/H Haryana Chd & Ors.

Ut of Chandigarh and Ors. Vs Arnun Kumar Kansal

Tarsem Singh Vs Ut of Chandigarh and Ors.

Tajinder Pal Singh Vs Director Rural Development & Panchayats & Ors.

Dera Shahi Samadhan Vs State of Punjab and Ors.