Remanded

Kulwinder Kaur & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Feb 2015CWP/3362/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order addressed a writ petition concerning land encroachment by the husband's wife of a previously evicted tenant served respondent No.4. The court did not express substantive views but directed the Block Development Officer to verify allegations and take action within one month, recalling the order if petitioners failed to supply copies to state counsel.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Majitha to verify allegations and take necessary action within one month.

Kulwinder Kaur & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors. — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.3362 of 2015 Date of Decision: February 25, 2015

¶3

Kulwinder Kaur and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

¶5

Present:Ms.Gagan Sharma, Advocate, for Ms.Amandeep Soni, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶6

-.-

¶7

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶8

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶9

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶10

¶11

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶12

Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only at

¶13

this stage.

¶14

On our asking, Mr.Aman Bahri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on their behalf.

¶15

Let three copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶16

Since no order prejudicial to the interest of respondent Nos.4 to 11 is being passed, we do not deem it

¶17

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.03.10 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP No.3362 of 2015

¶19

[2]

¶20

necessary to call upon them and having regard to the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is also not necessary to seek counter-reply from respondent Nos.1 to 3 at this stage.

¶21

The petitioners are Sarpanch and Members of the Gram Panchayat of village Jhande, Tehsil and District Amritsar. They allege that pursuant to a petition filed in the year 1997 under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, an eviction order was passed against Gurmeet Singh, husband of respondent No.4, on 15.01.1998. His appeal against that order was dismissed on 27.07.2001. Those orders were never challenged by Gurmeet Singh and have attained finality.

¶22

It is further averred that despite Gurmeet Singh stood evicted from unauthorized possession of the Gram Panchayat land, his wife-respondent No.4 with the facit support of other private-respondents including one member of the Gram Panchayat, has now started interfering in the possession of Gram Panchayat and attempts are being made to re-take the possession. It is further averred that a compliant has been made to the Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Majitha-respondent No.3, on 27.01.2015 but he too has taken no action to prevent the encroachment.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned State counsel but without expressing any views on the allegations made by the petitioners, moreso when we have not heard the private-respondents at this stage, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Majitha-respondent No.3 to verify the allegations made by the petitioners and take necessary action in accordance with law, within a period of

¶24

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.03.10 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶25

[3]

¶26

CWP No.3362 of 2015

¶27

one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT]

JUDGE

February 25, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE

¶33

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.03.10 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Kulwinder Kaur & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kulwinder Kaur & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganpat Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sanjeev etc. Vs State of Haryana etc.

Gurnam Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ram Acchal and Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jarnail Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Nathu Ram Vs State of Punjab and Ors.