Civil Writ Petition No. 2832 of 2015 was withdrawn by learned counsel for the petitioners, who stated that the underlying appeal was withdrawn on technical grounds and they would re-approach the Court if necessary.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.2832 of 2015 Date of Decision: February 23, 2015
Nanak Singh and another versus State of Punjab and others
.....Petitioners
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.
Present:Mr.Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
-.-
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this writ petition as, according to him, the appeal (Annexure P-5) has been withdrawn due to some technical ground and as and when the same is re-filed, he shall further approach this Court, if need be.
Ordered accordingly.
February 23, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.24 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Nanak Singh and another
State of Punjab and others
Surya Kant
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
