Disposed

Mahinder Singh and Ors. v. Director Rural Development & Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Dec 2015CWP/26583/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an order dismissing a claim for sale of village common land. The court, citing delay, did not interfere with the finding that the land was reserved for common purposes but directed the Petitioners to approach the Gram Panchayat for consideration of their claim under specific Rules, with a stay on demolition.

What did the court decide?

The Petitioners are directed to approach the Gram Panchayat within two weeks to consider their request for land sale under Rules 4 & 5 of 1964; the Competent Authority must approve within three months

Mahinder Singh and Ors. Vs Director Rural… — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.26583 of 2015 Date of Decision: December 21, 2015

¶3

Mahinder Singh and others

¶4

....Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab and others .....Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

¶8

¶9

Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, Additional AG, Punjab. Ms.Satpreet Grewal Kapila, Advocate, for the caveator-respondent No.3.

¶10

-.-

¶11

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶13

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

¶15

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶16

Notice of motion.

¶17

On our asking, Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, learned Additional Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2.

¶18

Let two copies of the writ petition be supplied to the State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶19

Respondent No.3-Gram Panchayat is on caveat. Ms.Satpreet Grewal Kapila, Advocate accepts notice on its behalf.

¶20

MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.01.06 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶21

CWP No.26583 of 2015

¶22

[2]

¶23

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage.

¶24

The petitioners have laid challenge to the order dated 21.02.2012 (P-13) passed by the Director, Rural Development and Panchayats-cum-Commissioner (Shamlat Land), Punjab under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, whereby the appeal preferred by respondent No.3 against the order of the Collector dated 16.02.2011 has been allowed and the petitioners' petition under Section 11 of the Act, which was allowed by the Collector, has been dismissed.

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the parties and the record perused.

¶26

In our considered view, the appellate order does not call for any interference for more than one reasons. Firstly, there is an inordinate delay of more than 3½ years in filing the writ petition and the same has not been satisfactorily explained. Secondly, the Appellate Authority has returned a firm finding of fact after appreciating entries in the revenue records that the subject land is a gair-mumkin pasture and/or gair-mumkin 'pond' and thus is reserved for common purposes. It, therefore, vests in gram panchayat.

¶27

Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon Rules 4 & 5 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 whereunder such like land which is in abadi deh and where houses are built or constructions raised, can be sold subject to fulfillment of the conditions prescribed therein.

¶28

MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.01.06 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶29

CWP No.26583 of 2015

¶30

[3]

¶31

We are inclined to accept the petitioner's claim to the limited extent that let the matter re: sale of land to them in terms of the above-stated Rules be considered. The writ petition is thus disposed of with a direction that the petitioners may approach the Gram Panchayat under the above-stated Rules within two weeks of receipt of copy of this order. The Gram Panchayat shall consider their request sympathetically subject to fulfillment of the conditions as prescribed in the Rules and in case the Gram Panchayat passes any resolution in this regard, the Competent Authority shall consider the same for according necessary approval within a period of three months from the date of passing of such resolution.

¶32

Till such an exercise is undertaken, status-quo re: demolition and further construction shall be maintained. Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT]

JUDGE

December 21, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE

¶37

MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.01.06 12:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Mahinder Singh and Ors. v. Director Rural Development & Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahinder Singh and Ors. v. Director Rural Development & Panchayats Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Goyal Vs State of Punjab

Parveen Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Anil Vs State of Punjab

Puran Singh Vs Commissioner Gurgaon Divn., Gurgaon & Ors.

Manpreet Singh @ Mani Vs State of Punjab

Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.