insubordination, vitiating the atmosphere of the department and disrupting the academic activities and levelling false allegations against his seniors, it has been stated that they are based on the evidence of Prof. A.K. Bansal, Head, Department of Pharmaceutical, who was and is inimical to the petitioner. He refers to the report of the Ombudsman/ Review Committee dated 22.04.2009 constituted by the Board of Governors to review the case of Dr. Aminesh Ray, Ex. Scientist, NIPER, which stated that Prof. K.K. Bhutani, Prof. Saranjit Singh, Prof. U.C. Banerjee, Prof. Rama Rao had a common nexus to keep Dr. Animesh Ray out of the system since he had blown the whistle against the unethical acts and wrong deeds at NIPER. Though, they had no doubt about the academic competence of Dr. Animesh Ray, yet they did not want him to be retained at NIPER, Mohali. He emphasized that Dr. Saranjit Singh and Dr. U.C. Banerjee who have been adversely commented upon by the Ombudsman are complainants and witnesses to prove article V of the charge and Dr. K.K. Bhutani is the Disciplinary Authority. As these three were held responsible for
